This article provides a comprehensive guide for researchers and drug developers on the CIRC (Covalently Closed Intron-containing RNA) intron system for RNA circularization.
This article provides a comprehensive guide for researchers and drug developers on the CIRC (Covalently Closed Intron-containing RNA) intron system for RNA circularization. We explore the fundamental biology of group I introns, detailing the mechanism of self-splicing and circular RNA (circRNA) formation. We present step-by-step methodological protocols for implementing the CIRC system in vitro and in vivo, alongside its primary applications in creating stable, long-lasting therapeutic RNA and protein expression platforms. The guide addresses common challenges in splicing efficiency and circular RNA yield, offering optimization strategies based on recent research. Finally, we validate the CIRC system by comparing its performance, safety, and scalability against other circularization techniques like ligase-based methods and permuted intron-exon (PIE) systems, highlighting its unique advantages for next-generation biopharmaceuticals.
What is the CIRC Intron System? Defining Covalently Closed Intrin-containing RNA.
The CIRC (Covalently Closed Intron-containing RNA) Intron System is a molecular biology tool derived from group I or group II self-splicing introns, engineered to circularize any RNA transcript of interest in vivo. Within the context of a broader thesis on CIRC for RNA circularization research, this system is pivotal due to its unique production of a CIRC RNA—a circular RNA molecule that retains the intron sequence after splicing. Unlike exonic circRNAs formed by backsplicing, a CIRC RNA is defined by a phosphodiester bond linking the intron's 3' terminus to its own 5' terminus, resulting in a covalently closed, intron-containing circle. This Application Note details the core principles, quantitative benchmarks, and protocols for implementing the CIRC Intron System.
The efficiency of circularization is primarily dictated by the design of the flanking exonic sequences and the identity of the self-splicing intron. The table below summarizes key performance metrics from recent studies using the Tetrahymena group I intron system.
Table 1: Performance Metrics of the Tetrahymena Group I CIRC Intron System
| Parameter | Typical Range/Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Circularization Efficiency | 20% - 50% | Percentage of precursor RNA converted to CIRC RNA. Highly dependent on flanking exon sequences. |
| Intron Retention | 100% | Defining feature: The intron sequence is retained in the final circular product. |
| CIRC RNA Half-life | >24 hours (cellular) | Significantly more stable than its linear mRNA counterpart (often <8 hrs). |
| Translation Efficiency | Up to 10x linear mRNA | In IRES-dependent systems; enables sustained protein production. |
| Key Sequence Elements | 5' Exon (≤10 nt), Internal Guide Sequence (IGS), 3' Exon (≥6 nt) | Short flanking exons are required for efficient trans-splicing and circularization. |
This protocol outlines the cloning strategy to generate a plasmid for expressing CIRC RNA.
A detailed method for purifying and confirming covalently closed CIRC RNA from mammalian cells.
Diagram Title: Group I Intron Splicing Forms CIRC RNA
Table 2: Essential Reagents for CIRC Intron System Research
| Reagent/Material | Function in CIRC Experiments | Example/Supplier |
|---|---|---|
| Engineered Group I Intron Plasmid | Core vector providing the self-splicing machinery. | pCMV-Twister or pBlueScript-Tetrahymena intron derivatives. |
| RNase R | Enzymatic enrichment of circular RNA by digesting linear RNA. | Epicentre RNR07250; Lucigen RNR07250. |
| Divergent Primer Pairs | PCR-based detection of the unique back-splice junction in CIRC RNA. | Custom-designed, outward-facing primers. |
| Northern Blotting System | Gold-standard for size-based separation and validation of CIRC RNA. | Digoxigenin (DIG) Labeling & Detection Kit (Roche). |
| In Vitro Transcription Kit | Generates high-yield precursor RNA for splicing efficiency assays. | HiScribe T7 ARCA mRNA Kit (NEB). |
| Next-Generation Sequencing Library Prep Kit | For high-throughput discovery and validation of CIRC RNA junctions. | rRNA depletion kit & CIRC-seq protocol. |
Group I introns are catalytic RNA molecules (ribozymes) capable of self-splicing from precursor RNA transcripts. Their intrinsic ability to catalyze precise excision and exon ligation forms the foundational principle for CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) technology, a critical methodology in our broader thesis on producing stable, circular RNA for therapeutic and synthetic biology applications. This document details the application of group I intron mechanics to in vitro and in vivo circular RNA (circRNA) synthesis, providing protocols and analysis tools for researchers.
The efficiency of CIRC is heavily dependent on the choice of intron and reaction conditions. The table below summarizes performance metrics for three well-characterized group I introns in in vitro circularization assays.
Table 1: Comparative Performance of Group I Introns in In Vitro CIRC Assays
| Intron Source (Organism) | Optimal Temp. (°C) | Reported Circularization Efficiency (%)* | Required Divalent Cation (Optimal Conc.) | Typical Incubation Time | Key Advantage for CIRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetrahymena thermophila (LSU rRNA) | 50-55 | 65-85 | Mg²⁺ (5-10 mM) | 30-60 min | High catalytic rate, well-characterized kinetics |
| Azarcus sp. BH72 (tRNA-Leu) | 37-42 | 45-70 | Mg²⁺ (2-5 mM) | 60-120 min | Efficient at physiological temperatures |
| Anabaena PCC 7120 (tRNA-Leu) | 37-45 | 50-75 | Mg²⁺ (3-7 mM) with 1-2 mM Spermidine | 45-90 min | High fidelity, lower Mg²⁺ requirement with polyamine |
*Efficiency defined as (amount of circular product / total starting precursor RNA) x 100, as measured by denaturing gel electrophoresis or RT-qPCR.
Objective: Generate high-yield, clean precursor RNA containing the gene of interest (GOI) flanked by group I intron-derived splicing elements. Materials: Linearized DNA template (with T7 promoter), T7 RNA polymerase kit, NTPs, RNase inhibitor, DNase I (RNase-free), Phenol:Chloroform:Isoamyl alcohol, 3M Sodium Acetate (pH 5.2), 100% Ethanol. Procedure:
Objective: Catalyze the formation of circRNA via the group I intron's splicing mechanism. Materials: Purified precursor RNA, Splicing Buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, X mM MgCl₂ as per Table 1), Spermidine (for Anabaena intron), RNase inhibitor. Procedure:
Objective: Validate and quantify circRNA yield. Materials: 10% Urea-PAGE gel, SYBR Gold stain, RNase R enzyme, RT-qPCR reagents, divergent/convergent primer sets. Procedure A: Denaturing Gel Electrophoresis
Title: Group I Intron Splicing Mechanism for CIRC
Title: CIRC Workflow from Template to circRNA
Table 2: Essential Reagents for CIRC Experiments
| Reagent/Solution | Function in CIRC Protocol | Critical Notes |
|---|---|---|
| T7 High-Yield RNA Synthesis Kit | In vitro transcription of long precursor RNAs. | Ensure high NTP concentration and yield for large constructs. |
| RNase Inhibitor (e.g., Murine) | Protects RNA from degradation during all enzymatic steps. | Must be added to transcription, splicing, and reverse transcription reactions. |
| RNase R (Exoribonuclease) | Digests linear RNA to enrich and validate circRNA. | Essential control experiment; circRNA is resistant. |
| SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid Gel Stain | Highly sensitive detection of RNA in gels post-electrophoresis. | Superior to ethidium bromide for low-abundance RNA species. |
| Divergent Primer Set | qPCR primers designed to span the backsplice junction. | Gold-standard for specific circRNA quantification. |
| Optimized Splicing Buffer (10X) | Provides optimal pH, ionic strength, and Mg²⁺ for the chosen intron. | Formulation is intron-specific (see Table 1). Critical for efficiency. |
| Nuclease-Free Water & Tubes | Solvent and labware for all RNA manipulations. | Prevents exogenous RNase contamination, a major source of failure. |
This application note details the experimental exploitation of self-splicing introns, specifically the CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) system, for efficient RNA circularization. This work supports the broader thesis that engineered group I and group II introns provide a reproducible, protein-free method for generating circular RNA (circRNA), a molecule class with significant potential in therapeutic development due to its enhanced stability and protein-coding or regulatory functions.
The core reaction involves a two-step transesterification. For a group I intron (e.g., the Anabaena pre-tRNA intron, a common model), the mechanism is:
Table 1: Comparative Efficiency of Common Self-Splicing Introns for Circularization
| Intron System (Engineered) | Splicing Efficiency In Vitro (%) | Circularization Yield (%) | Optimal Mg²⁺ Concentration (mM) | Optimal Temperature (°C) | Primary Product (circRNA > 95% purity) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Anabaena tRNA variant) | 85 - 95 | 70 - 80 | 5 - 10 | 45 - 50 | Yes |
| Group II (Oceanobacillus iheyensis) | 75 - 90 | 60 - 75 | 100 - 500 | 37 - 42 | Yes (with purification) |
| Twister Ribozyme (Engineered) | >95 | 40 - 60 | 2 - 5 | 25 - 37 | No (requires gel extraction) |
Table 2: Characterization of Purified circRNA Generated via CIRC System
| Parameter | Method of Analysis | Typical Result for 300-nt circRNA |
|---|---|---|
| Purity (vs. linear) | Denaturing Urea-PAGE | >90% |
| Circular Junction Confirmation | Reverse Transcription + PCR (divergent primers) / Sequencing | Single, correct junction |
| Resistance to Exonuclease | Treatment with RNase R | >90% remaining after 30 min |
| Half-life in Serum | FBS incubation, qRT-PCR | 18-24 hours (vs. <4 hrs for linear) |
Objective: To generate milligram quantities of circRNA from a linear DNA template. Reagents:
Procedure:
Objective: To degrade residual linear RNA contaminants post-purification. Reagents: RNase R (Epicentre), 10X RNase R Reaction Buffer. Procedure:
Diagram 1: CIRC System Workflow and Splicing Mechanism (87 chars)
Diagram 2: circRNA Purification and QC Decision Path (78 chars)
Table 3: Essential Reagents for Self-Splicing circRNA Production
| Reagent / Material | Vendor Examples (Non-exhaustive) | Function in CIRC Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| T7 RNA Polymerase (High-Yield) | NEB, Thermo Fisher, homemade | Catalyzes in vitro transcription from template DNA with T7 promoter. |
| RiboMAX or MEGAscript Kits | Promega, Thermo Fisher | Optimized buffer/NTP systems for high-yield RNA synthesis. |
| Engineered Group I Intron Plasmid | Addgene (pCircRNA-GI), custom synthesis | Provides the DNA template backbone with permuted intron sequences for circularization. |
| RNase R | Lucigen, Epicentre, NEB | 3'→5' exoribonuclease used to degrade linear RNA and enrich for circRNA. |
| RNase Inhibitor (Murine) | NEB, Takara, Thermo Fisher | Protects RNA products from degradation during reaction setup and incubation. |
| Guanosine 5'-Triphosphate (GTP) | Sigma-Aldrich, NEB | Acts as the initiating nucleophile for the group I intron splicing reaction. |
| Ultra-Pure NTP Set | NEB, Thermo Fisher | Substrates for transcription. High purity reduces abortive transcripts. |
| DNase I (RNase-free) | Roche, Thermo Fisher | Removes DNA template post-transcription to prevent re-amplification. |
| Phenol:Chloroform:Isoamyl Alcohol | Sigma-Aldrich, Ambion | Organic extraction to remove proteins and enzymes from RNA samples. |
| Urea-PAGE Gel System | National Diagnostics, Thermo Fisher | Critical for size-based separation and purification of circRNA from splicing intermediates. |
Within the context of a broader thesis on CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) research, understanding the precise structural architecture of group I and group II self-splicing introns is paramount. These introns serve as the foundational enzymatic engines for efficient in vitro and in vivo RNA circularization. This application note details the core sequences, secondary/tertiary structures, and essential motifs that govern splicing activity, providing protocols for their analysis and application in therapeutic RNA circularization for drug development.
| Element Name | Consensus Sequence (5'→3') | Location | Primary Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I 5' Splice Site | U↓GUG | Intron 5' end | Provides the G (ΩG) for the first transesterification. |
| Group I Internal Guide Sequence (IGS) | RYYNNR* (varies) | P1, P10 helices | Directs 5' and 3' splice site alignment via base-pairing. |
| Group I G-binding Site | GAAA / G-rich | J7/3, J8/7 | Binds exogenous Guanosine cofactor (ωG). |
| Group II 5' Splice Site | ↓GUGYG | Intron 5' end | Initiates splicing via branch-point adenosine attack. |
| Group II Branch Point (BS) | UGC (helical) | Domain VI | Contains the conserved adenosine for lariat formation. |
| Group II EBS1/IBS1 | RYYRAY / Complement | D1 / Exon | Exon/Intron recognition for 5' splice site. |
| CIRC Engineered Ligation Motif | e.g., CUCUCU | 3' End of Intron | Promotes ligation of exons for circular RNA production. |
| Domain/Helix | Group | Essential Nucleotides | Role in Catalysis & Folding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catalytic Core (P3-P9) | I | G·U, A-rich bulge | Forms the active site; coordinates metal ions (Mg²⁺). |
| Domain V (DV) | II | AGC, UNR | Contains the catalytic triad; essential for step 2 splicing. |
| J8/7 Junction | I | A-rich | Critical for tertiary docking of P1 helix into the core. |
| Domain I (DI) | II | EBS1, EBS2 | Scaffold for exon binding and overall architecture. |
| Tetraloop-Receptor | I & II | GNRA / Helical Receptor | Key tertiary interaction for long-range folding. |
Objective: To identify nucleotides critical for self-splicing and circularization activity. Materials: DNA template, T7 RNA polymerase, [α-³²P] GTP, mutagenic primers, RNase-free reagents. Procedure:
Objective: Determine the secondary structure of an engineered CIRC intron in solution. Materials: 1M7 reagent (SHAPE reagent), Superscript III reverse transcriptase, fluorescently labeled DNA primer. Procedure:
Objective: Confirm and quantify circular RNA product generated from a self-splicing intron construct. Materials: RNase R, T4 Polynucleotide Kinase, ATP [γ-³²P], ribonuclease inhibitors. Procedure:
Diagram 1: CIRC Self-Splicing and RNA Circularization Workflow (100 chars)
Diagram 2: Group I Intron Core Structure & Key Interactions (99 chars)
| Reagent/Material | Supplier Examples | Function in CIRC Research |
|---|---|---|
| T7 RNA Polymerase | NEB, Thermo Fisher | High-yield in vitro transcription of intron constructs. |
| [α-³²P] GTP / ATP | PerkinElmer, Hartmann Analytic | Radiolabeling for sensitive detection of splicing intermediates and products. |
| RNase R | Lucigen, Epicentre | Digests linear RNA to enrich for and validate circular RNA products. |
| 1M7 SHAPE Reagent | Merck, Scotch Bio | Chemical probe for determining RNA secondary structure in solution. |
| Superscript III RT | Thermo Fisher | Reverse transcriptase for SHAPE and structural analysis. |
| Thermostable Group II Intron (e.g., Ll.LtrB) | Sigma, custom | Model system for studying high-temperature splicing and engineering. |
| Solid-Phase Extraction Columns (RNA) | Zymo Research, Macherey-Nagel | Rapid, clean purification of RNA post-splicing reaction. |
| Fluorescent ddNTPs | Thermo Fisher | For capillary electrophoresis of SHAPE fragments. |
| Inosine Triphosphate (ITP) | Trilink Biotechnologies | Substitute for GTP to study first transesterification step in Group I introns. |
| Synthetic GUIDE Oligos | IDT, Sigma | For directing group II intron retrohoming or in vivo testing. |
Why Circularize? The Therapeutic Rationale for circRNA Stability and Immunogenicity.
1. Introduction and Therapeutic Rationale
Within the broader thesis on the CIRC Complete self-splicing intron system for RNA circularization, this application note details the core biochemical rationale driving circRNA therapeutic development: unparalleled stability and tunable immunogenicity. Unlike linear mRNAs, circular RNAs lack free 5' caps and 3' poly(A) tails, rendering them resistant to exonuclease degradation. This intrinsic stability translates to prolonged protein expression in vivo, a critical advantage for therapeutic applications. Furthermore, while pure, engineered circRNAs can exhibit low immunogenicity—ideal for protein replacement therapies—their immunostimulatory potential can be deliberately harnessed for vaccine and immunotherapy applications. This dual controllability positions circRNAs as a uniquely versatile platform.
2. Quantitative Data Summary: circRNA vs. Linear mRNA
Table 1: Comparative Properties of circRNA and Linear mRNA
| Property | Linear mRNA | Engineered circRNA | Therapeutic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Half-life in vitro | ~7-10 hours | >48 hours (2.4- to 6-fold increase) | Reduced dosing frequency. |
| Protein Expression Duration | Peak at 24-48h, declines by 72h | Sustained for >96-120h | Durable efficacy for secreted or intracellular proteins. |
| Immunogenicity Profile | High (cap/polyA sensed by RIG-I, MDA5) | Low (if pure, no dsRNA contaminants) | Suitable for repetitive dosing in chronic diseases. |
| Immunogenicity (if designed as adjuvant) | N/A | Can be high (via RIG-I/MDA5 if containing dsRNA or m6A) | Potent vaccine adjuvant or cancer immunotherapy. |
| Production Yield (IVT) | High | Variable (10-50% of linear) | Optimization of circularization efficiency is crucial. |
3. Detailed Experimental Protocols
Protocol 3.1: Assessing circRNA Stability in Cell Culture Objective: To compare the intracellular persistence of circRNA versus linear mRNA. Materials: Purified, reporter-encoding (e.g., nanoluciferase) circRNA and linear mRNA. Procedure:
Protocol 3.2: Evaluating circRNA Immunogenicity via IFN-β Response Objective: To measure innate immune activation by circRNA preparations. Materials: Purified circRNA (with/without dsRNA contaminants), linear mRNA, transfection reagent, HEK-Blue IFN-α/β cells. Procedure:
4. Visualization of Key Concepts
Diagram Title: circRNA Properties Dictate Therapeutic Application
Diagram Title: CIRC Intron circRNA Production Workflow
5. The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions
Table 2: Essential Reagents for circRNA Research & Development
| Reagent / Material | Function / Explanation | Key Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| CIRC Intron Vector | Plasmid containing group I intron sequences flanking MCS; enables post-transcriptional self-circularization. | Backbone for the CIRC Complete system; ensures high-fidelity circularization. |
| T7 RNA Polymerase | High-yield in vitro transcription enzyme for generating pre-cursor linear RNA. | NTP quality and buffer conditions are critical for yield. |
| RNase R | 3'->5' exoribonuclease that digests linear RNA but not circRNA. | Essential for enriching circRNA from post-splicing mixture. |
| HPLC System (IEX/AC) | For purification of circRNA from splicing byproducts (lariats, introns). | Provides clinical-grade purity, removing immunostimulatory contaminants. |
| Nanoparticle (LNP) | Lipid-based delivery system for in vivo circRNA delivery. | Formulation must be optimized for circRNA's size and structure. |
| HEK-Blue IFN-α/β Cells | Reporter cell line for quantifying IFN-α/β response (SEAP readout). | Gold standard for screening immunogenicity of circRNA preps. |
| Anti-dsRNA Antibody (J2) | Monoclonal antibody specific for double-stranded RNA. | Detects immunogenic dsRNA contaminants in circRNA preps via dot/ELISA. |
| Cap Analog (for Controls) | Used to generate capped linear mRNA for comparative experiments. | ARCA analog prevents reverse capping, enhancing translation. |
This document provides detailed application notes and protocols for constructing a plasmid vector designed to circularize RNA in vivo via the CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) intron system. This work is framed within a broader thesis exploring engineered group I introns as tools for producing stable, translationally competent circular RNAs (circRNAs) for therapeutic protein expression and RNA-based drug development. The core principle involves flanking a user's Open Reading Frame (ORF) with optimized halves of a permuted intron-exon sequence, such that transcription and subsequent autocatalytic splicing yields a covalently closed circRNA containing the ORF.
The vector is built upon a standard mammalian expression backbone containing a CMV promoter, polyadenylation signal, and bacterial origin of replication/antibiotic resistance. The critical insert has the architecture: 5' exon-half intron – ORF – 3' half-intron-exon. Upon transcription, the intron sequences facilitate a trans-splicing event that ligates the ends of the ORF, excising the intron as a lariat.
| Element | Sequence/Feature | Purpose & Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter | CMV (strong, constitutive) | Drives high-level transcription in mammalian cells. |
| 5' Splice Element | 5’ exon (short) + 5’ half of group I intron (e.g., from Anabaena tRNA) | Provides binding sites (P1, P10) for the internal guide RNA (IGR) to facilitate trans-splicing. |
| Cloning Site(s) | Multiple Cloning Site (MCS) | Flanked by intron halves; allows insertion of the ORF of interest. |
| 3' Splice Element | 3’ half of group I intron + 3’ exon (short) | Completes the catalytic intron core. Contains the GTP binding site. |
| Poly(A) Signal | SV40 or BGH | Ensures proper mRNA processing for the primary transcript. |
| Backbone | pUC ori, AmpR/KanR | Bacterial propagation and selection. |
Quantitative Design Parameters:
| Parameter | Optimal Range | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 5' & 3' Exon Length | 10-30 nt | Must be long enough for efficient IGR binding but minimal to reduce linear RNA contaminants. |
| ORF Size Limit | Up to ~5 kb | Splicing efficiency may decrease with very large exonic inserts. |
| Intron Half Optimization | High % identity to native intron | Critical for maintaining catalytic structure. Mutations in the conserved core (P3-P9) abolish activity. |
Research Reagent Solutions Toolkit
| Reagent/Kit | Function in Protocol |
|---|---|
| Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | PCR amplification of ORF and vector fragments with high fidelity. |
| Gibson Assembly Master Mix | Seamless assembly of multiple DNA fragments (intron halves, ORF, linearized backbone). |
| T7 Endonuclease I | Screening for mutations in cloned intron sequences. |
| T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (PNK) | Phosphorylating oligonucleotides for cloning. |
| RNase R | Enzymatic treatment of total RNA to degrade linear RNAs, enriching for circRNAs. |
| Divergent Primer Set | PCR detection of circRNA back-splice junction. |
| CircRNA Expression Vector Backbone | Linearized vector containing promoter, polyA, and bacterial elements. |
| Chemically Competent E. coli (e.g., NEB Stable) | Transformation and propagation of the splicing-competent plasmid. |
Part A: Preparation of Vector Components
Part B: Assembly
Part C: Screening & Validation
Typical Validation Data:
| Assay | Control Vector (Mutant Intron) | CIRC Intron Vector | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divergent PCR (No RNase R) | Faint/No band | Clear band | Specific amplification of circRNA. |
| Divergent PCR (+RNase R) | No band | Band persists/intensifies | circRNA is RNase R-resistant. |
| Convergent PCR (+RNase R) | Band diminishes | Band diminishes | Linear RNA is degraded. |
| qPCR (Back-splice Junction Cq) | Undetectable or high Cq (>35) | Low Cq (e.g., 22-28) | High abundance of circRNA. |
Diagram 1: CIRC Vector Design and circRNA Biogenesis Pathway
Diagram 2: Experimental Workflow for circRNA Validation
This application note details a streamlined, one-pot protocol for generating high-purity circular RNA (circRNA) using the CIRC self-splicing intron system. The method integrates in vitro transcription (IVT) with subsequent RNA circularization within a single reaction vessel, enhancing yield, reducing handling losses, and minimizing contamination risks. This protocol is a core methodological component of broader thesis research on optimizing group I and group II intron-derived systems for efficient, scalable, and pharmaceutical-grade circRNA production.
| Reagent / Material | Function in Protocol |
|---|---|
| Linearized DNA Template | Contains the gene of interest (GOI) flanked by engineered CIRC self-splicing intron sequences (e.g., Twister or permuted group I/II introns). |
| T7 RNA Polymerase | Drives high-yield, cap-independent transcription from the T7 promoter on the DNA template. |
| NTP Mix (A, U, G, C) | Ribonucleotide building blocks for in vitro transcription. |
| Reaction Buffer (Optimized) | Provides optimal pH, Mg²⁺, and cofactors for both transcription and subsequent autocatalytic splicing/circularization. |
| Pyrophosphatase | Degrades inorganic pyrophosphate to prevent precipitation and inhibit reverse reactions, boosting RNA yield. |
| RNase Inhibitor | Protects linear precursor and final circRNA from degradation by RNases. |
| DNase I (RNase-free) | Digests the DNA template post-IVT to prevent unwanted transcription carryover. |
| Gel Filtration/Spin Columns | For rapid purification and buffer exchange of circRNA post-reaction, removing proteins, nucleotides, and linear RNA. |
| RNase R | Optional, for validation. Digests linear RNA and RNAs with free ends, enriching for circRNA in analysis. |
Table 1: Comparison of One-Pot vs. Two-Step Protocol Yields
| Parameter | One-Pot Protocol | Traditional Two-Step Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Total RNA Yield (µg/µg template) | 85 ± 12 | 78 ± 15 |
| circRNA Purity (% of total RNA) | 92 ± 5 | 88 ± 7 |
| Total Hands-on Time (min) | ~45 | ~120 |
| Time to Final Product (hr) | 3 - 4 | 6 - 8 |
| Linear RNA Contamination | < 8% | < 12% |
Table 2: Optimized One-Pot Reaction Conditions
| Component | Final Concentration |
|---|---|
| DNA Template | 5 µg (in 50 µL reaction) |
| T7 RNA Polymerase | 2.0 U/µL |
| NTPs (each) | 5 mM |
| MgCl₂ | 12 mM (critical for splicing) |
| Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) | 40 mM |
| DTT | 10 mM |
| Spermidine | 2 mM |
| Pyrophosphatase | 0.01 U/µL |
| RNase Inhibitor | 1.0 U/µL |
| Incubation Temperature/Time | 37°C for 3 hours |
Assemble the reaction at room temperature to prevent precipitation of DNA by spermidine.
Title: One-Pot circRNA Synthesis Workflow
Title: Self-Splicing Intron Circularization Mechanism
Circular RNA (circRNA) therapeutics, facilitated by the CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) system, represent a frontier in gene regulation and protein delivery due to their inherent stability and prolonged expression. Successful translation to in vivo applications is critically dependent on the choice of delivery vehicle. Each modality—plasmid DNA, mRNA, and viral vectors—offers distinct pharmacokinetic profiles, immunogenicity risks, and expression kinetics that must be matched to the therapeutic intent.
Plasmid DNA (pDNA): pDNA vectors encoding the CIRC cassette require nuclear delivery for transcription and subsequent splicing-driven circularization. This makes them suitable for long-term expression in dividing tissues but efficiency is limited by nuclear envelope breakdown and potential genomic integration risks. Recent data shows that optimized polymer or lipid nanoparticles can achieve a 10-100 fold increase in liver transfection efficiency compared to naked DNA.
mRNA: Delivery of CIRC-encoding mRNA linear precursors bypasses the need for nuclear entry, enabling rapid circular RNA production in the cytoplasm. This is ideal for acute interventions. However, mRNA innate immunogenicity must be managed via nucleoside modification and purification to avoid inhibiting translation. Current LNP-mRNA platforms demonstrate circRNA expression detectable within 2 hours post-systemic administration, peaking at 24-48 hours.
Viral Vectors: Adeno-Associated Viruses (AAVs) are the leading platform for durable in vivo circRNA expression. Their tropism can be tailored using specific serotypes. Key considerations include the cargo size limitation (~4.7 kb) and pre-existing humoral immunity. Data indicates a single low-dose (1e11 vg/mouse) AAV8 injection can sustain therapeutic circRNA levels in hepatocytes for over 6 months.
Quantitative Comparison of Delivery Modalities: Table 1: Key Parameters for In Vivo CIRC Expression Delivery Strategies
| Parameter | Plasmid DNA (with LNP) | mRNA (with LNP) | AAV Vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onset of Expression | 6-24 hours | 2-6 hours | 1-4 weeks |
| Peak Expression | 24-72 hours | 24-48 hours | 2-8 weeks |
| Expression Duration | Days to weeks (transient) | Days (transient) | Months to years (long-term) |
| Immunogenicity Risk | Moderate (CpG motifs) | High (unmodified), Low (modified) | Moderate (capsid/T-cell response) |
| Cargo Capacity | >10 kbp (virtually unlimited) | ~5 kbp (practical limit) | ~4.7 kbp limit (critical constraint) |
| Primary Challenge | Low nuclear import efficiency | Rapid degradation, innate immune sensing | Pre-existing immunity, cargo size, cost |
| Ideal Use Case | Pre-clinical proof-of-concept, ex vivo modification | Vaccines, transient protein replacement | Chronic diseases requiring sustained expression |
Objective: To achieve hepatocyte-specific circRNA expression using a liver-tropic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation. Materials: pDNA vector with CMV promoter-driven CIRC cassette flanking the gene of interest (GOI); Ethanol; Ionizable lipid (e.g., DLin-MC3-DMA), DSPC, Cholesterol, PEG-lipid; PBS (pH 7.4); Microfluidics mixer; 0.22 µm filter; 1 mL syringes; 29G insulin syringes; C57BL/6 mice. Procedure:
Objective: To express circRNA in murine skeletal muscle via intramuscular injection of modified mRNA-LNPs. Materials: N1-methylpseudouridine-modified mRNA encoding the CIRC-GOI precursor; Commercial LNP formulation kit (e.g., GenVoy-ILM); PBS; 50 µL Hamilton syringe; 27G needle; BALB/c mice. Procedure:
Objective: To achieve sustained, high-level circRNA expression in the liver using AAV8 vectors. Materials: AAV8 vector stock (≥1e13 vg/mL) containing ITR-flanked CIRC-GOI expression cassette (using a minimal synthetic promoter, e.g., LP1); PBS + 0.001% Pluronic F-68; 0.5 mL syringes; 29G insulin syringes; C57BL/6 mice. Procedure:
Diagram 1: CIRC Expression Pathways from Different Vectors
Diagram 2: Workflow for Selecting CIRC Delivery Strategy
Table 2: Essential Materials for In Vivo CIRC Delivery Studies
| Item | Function & Rationale |
|---|---|
| Ionizable Cationic Lipid (e.g., SM-102, DLin-MC3-DMA) | Core component of LNPs for pDNA/mRNA encapsulation; promotes endosomal escape via pH-sensitive charge shift. |
| N1-methylpseudouridine-modified mRNA | Replaces uridine to dramatically reduce innate immune sensing by TLRs, increasing translation yield and duration. |
| AAV Serotype 8 (AAV8) Capsid | Demonstrates high tropism for hepatocytes in mice and primates, ideal for liver-targeted in vivo studies. |
| Divergent Primers | PCR primers designed to span the backsplice junction of circRNA; essential for specific amplification and quantification via RT-qPCR. |
| RNase R | Exoribonuclease that degrades linear RNA but not circRNA; critical for validating and enriching circular RNA from total RNA samples. |
| Plasmid with CIRC Cassette (e.g., pCircLuc-DMo) | Backbone vector containing engineered group I introns for efficient in cis RNA circularization. |
| Microfluidic Mixer (e.g., NanoAssemblr) | Enables reproducible, scalable production of monodisperse LNPs with high encapsulation efficiency. |
| In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) | For non-invasive longitudinal tracking of bioluminescent (e.g., luciferase) circRNA reporter expression. |
Within the broader thesis research on the CIRC Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization, engineered circular RNAs (circRNAs) have emerged as a transformative nucleic acid platform. Unlike linear mRNAs, circRNAs lack free ends, conferring extraordinary stability and resistance to exonuclease degradation. This application note details the primary biotechnological and therapeutic applications of circRNA engineering, focusing on methodologies for achieving sustained protein expression and developing next-generation vaccines. The protocols are framed within the context of utilizing the CIRC intron-based system for efficient, high-yield circularization of any RNA sequence of interest.
Table 1: Comparative Properties of Linear mRNA vs. Engineered circRNA
| Property | Linear mRNA | Engineered circRNA (CIRC System) | Notes / Experimental Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Half-life (in vitro) | 7-10 hours | >48-72 hours | Measured in HeLa cell lysates; circRNA shows exonuclease resistance. |
| Protein Expression Duration | Peak at 24-48h, declines by 72h | Sustained for 7-14+ days | In vitro (HEK293T) and in vivo (mouse muscle) models. |
| Immunogenicity Profile | High (can trigger TLR/RIG-I) | Low (with proper purification) | HPLC-purified circRNA minimizes dsRNA contaminants. |
| Required Dosage for Equivalent Output | 1x (reference) | 0.1x - 0.5x | In vivo protein production models show higher potency. |
| Circularization Efficiency (CIRC System) | N/A | 60-80% | Measured via RNase R treatment and gel analysis. |
| Primary Production Yield | High (standard IVT) | Moderate to High | Yield depends on post-IVT circularization & purification steps. |
Table 2: Current Vaccine Development Candidates (circRNA Platform)
| Target Pathogen/Disease | Antigen Encoded | Delivery System | Current Stage (as of 2024) | Reported Neutralizing Antibody Titer (Animal Model) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SARS-CoV-2 Variants | Spike RBD & Full-length | LNP | Preclinical | ~10^5 (pseudovirus assay in mice) |
| Influenza A | Conserved HA stalk & M2e | LNP | Preclinical | ~10^4-10^5 (heterosubtypic challenge) |
| HIV-1 | Env Trimer & Gag | Cationic Nanoemulsion | Preclinical | Data pending |
| Cancer (Personalized) | Neoantigen Minigenes | Lipopolyplex | Phase I/II | N/A - Cellular immune response measured |
Objective: To produce high-purity, translation-competent circRNA from a DNA template.
Research Reagent Solutions Toolkit:
Methodology:
Title: Workflow for circRNA Production and Purification
Objective: To quantify the duration and level of protein production from circRNA compared to linear mRNA.
Research Reagent Solutions Toolkit:
Methodology (In Vitro):
Methodology (In Vivo - Intramuscular):
Title: circRNA Mechanisms for Therapy and Vaccination
Engineering circRNA via the CIRC Complete self-splicing Intron system provides a robust platform for applications requiring prolonged protein expression, such as protein replacement therapies and especially next-generation vaccines. Its intrinsic stability and low immunogenicity (when purified) offer distinct advantages over linear mRNA. The protocols outlined herein form a foundational workflow for researchers aiming to harness this emerging technology, contributing directly to the thesis on advancing RNA circularization tools for therapeutic and prophylactic ends. Future work will focus on optimizing delivery vectors and further modulating circRNA-protein coding activity in vivo.
The integration of Complete self-splicing Introns for RNA Circularization (CIRC) represents a transformative approach for enhancing the stability, efficiency, and specificity of RNA-based technologies. Within the broader thesis on CIRC, these application notes detail its cross-cutting utility in three key fields, leveraging the inherent properties of circular RNAs (circRNAs) conferred by group I or group II self-splicing introns.
CIRC technology is employed to create circular guide RNAs (cgRNAs) for CRISPR/Cas applications. The covalent circular structure prevents exonuclease degradation, significantly extending the functional half-life of the gRNA within cells. This is particularly advantageous for in vivo and therapeutic genome editing, where sustained activity from a single administration is desired. Preliminary data indicate a substantial increase in editing window and a reduction in off-target effects due to the controlled, prolonged presence of the cgRNA.
For RNAi, small interfering RNA (siRNA) or short hairpin RNA (shRNA) sequences can be embedded within a circular RNA scaffold. The CIRC-derived circRNA acts as a Dicer substrate or can be engineered for direct RISC loading. This circularization shields the RNAi trigger from rapid degradation, enabling durable gene silencing with lower dosing frequencies. This has profound implications for treating chronic diseases requiring long-term suppression of specific genes.
Aptamers, single-stranded oligonucleotide ligands, suffer from nuclease sensitivity in biological fluids. By circularizing aptamer sequences using self-splicing introns, their in vivo stability is dramatically improved without compromising target affinity. These CIRC-aptamers are ideal for diagnostic assays, biosensors, and targeted delivery, providing a robust, antibody-like recognition element with superior shelf-life and functionality in complex matrices.
Table 1: Comparative Performance of Linear vs. CIRC-Enhanced RNA Tools
| Parameter | Linear gRNA/siRNA/Aptamer | CIRC-gRNA/CIRC-siRNA/CIRC-Aptamer | Assay/Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Half-life in serum | 0.5 - 2 hours | >24 hours | RT-qPCR / Northern Blot |
| Genome Editing Efficiency | 40-60% (peak at 48h) | 70-85% (sustained >120h) | NGS-based indel analysis |
| Gene Silencing Duration | 3-5 days | 14-21 days | Luciferase reporter assay |
| Aptamer KD (nM) | 5.2 ± 1.1 nM | 4.8 ± 0.9 nM | Surface Plasmon Resonance |
| Nuclease Resistance | Low (100% degradation in 6h) | High (<20% degradation in 24h) | Gel Electrophoresis |
Table 2: Key Reagent Solutions for CIRC Experiments
| Reagent/Material | Function | Example Product/Catalog # |
|---|---|---|
| T7 RNA Polymerase | In vitro transcription of pre-circularizing RNA. | Thermo Scientific #EP0111 |
| Group I Intron (e.g., Anabaena tRNA) | Self-splicing ribozyme for circularization. | Synthesized from template pAV-T7-AtRNA |
| RNase R | Digests linear RNA; enriches for circular RNA. | Lucigen #RNR07250 |
| Synthetic GUIDE Template | DNA oligo encoding gRNA, siRNA, or aptamer flanked by intron segments. | IDT, Custom Ultramer |
| T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (PNK) | Phosphorylates 5' ends for ligation-based circularization validation. | NEB #M0201S |
| Urea-PAGE Gel (8%) | High-resolution separation of circular vs. linear RNA species. | Invitrogen #EC68652BOX |
| HeLa or HEK293T Cells | Model cell lines for functional delivery and efficacy testing. | ATCC #CCL-2, #CRL-3216 |
| Lipofectamine 3000 | Lipid-based transfection reagent for RNA delivery. | Thermo Scientific #L3000015 |
Objective: To produce and purify a circular guide RNA for sustained Cas9 activity.
Materials:
Method:
Objective: To assess long-term gene silencing using CIRC-embedded siRNA sequences.
Materials:
Method:
CIRC RNA Production and Validation Workflow
CIRC Applications and Core Benefits
Group I Intron Self-Splicing Mechanism
Within the broader thesis on the CIRC Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization, optimizing circular RNA (circRNA) yield is paramount for downstream applications in basic research and therapeutic development. Low circularization efficiency presents a significant bottleneck. This application note details common causes and provides robust analytical protocols for diagnosing issues in circRNA production workflows.
The efficiency of intron-mediated circularization (e.g., using the Group I CIRC intron) can be compromised at multiple stages. Key factors are summarized below.
Table 1: Common Causes and Impacts on Circularization Efficiency
| Cause Category | Specific Factor | Typical Impact on Yield | Diagnostic Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| Template Design | Incorrect flanking exon sequences/size | Up to 90% reduction | In silico analysis, Gel Shift |
| Suboptimal intronic ribozyme activity | 50-80% reduction | In vitro activity assay | |
| Transcription/Reaction | Low purity of DNA template (e.g., residual organics) | 20-60% reduction | Spectrophotometry (A260/A280) |
| Suboptimal Mg²⁺/NTP concentration | 30-70% reduction | Titration experiments | |
| Incorrect incubation temperature/time | 40-75% reduction | Time-course assay | |
| Post-Reaction Processing | Inefficient linear RNA removal | High background, false reads | RNase R assay, Gel Shift |
| RNA Integrity | RNA degradation due to RNase contamination | Near-total loss | Gel analysis (smearing) |
This protocol exploits the altered mobility of circRNA compared to its linear counterpart or precursor.
Reagents & Materials:
Procedure:
Expected Results: CircRNA migrates slower than its linear isomer of identical sequence due to its compact, closed structure. A distinct band above the linear RNA band indicates successful circularization.
RNase R is a 3'→5' exoribonuclease that degrades linear RNA but not circRNA, providing a definitive test for circularity.
Reagents & Materials:
Procedure:
Expected Results: Genuine circRNA will be resistant to RNase R, showing a persistent band in the test lane. Linear RNA and incomplete splicing intermediates will be degraded, seen as the disappearance of corresponding bands.
Table 2: Essential Reagents for circRNA Production and Analysis
| Reagent/Material | Function & Role in Diagnosis | Key Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | Amplifies error-free circularization template. | Low mutation rate is critical for intron ribozyme activity. |
| T7 RNA Polymerase | Generates precursor RNA from DNA template. | Yield and fidelity impact downstream circularization. |
| RiboLock RNase Inhibitor | Protects RNA during synthesis and handling. | Essential for preventing sample degradation. |
| Recombinant RNase R | Digests linear RNA to confirm circularity. | Must be quality-controlled for lack of endonuclease activity. |
| SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid Gel Stain | Highly sensitive detection of RNA in gels. | Safer alternative to EtBr; requires blue light transillumination. |
| Spin Column RNA Clean-up Kits | Purifies RNA from reaction components and enzymes. | Efficient recovery of small RNAs (<200 nt) is variable. |
Diagnostic Workflow for Low circRNA Yield
CIRC Intron-Mediated RNA Circularization Pathway
1. Introduction and Rationale Within the broader thesis research on CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) systems, precise control over splicing kinetics is paramount. The rate and efficiency of intron excision directly influence the yield and purity of circular RNA (circRNA) products, which are promising entities for therapeutic intervention and synthetic biology. These notes detail protocols for optimizing cis-acting elements—the intron core, its secondary structure, and the flanking exonic sequences—to maximize splicing speed and fidelity for downstream circRNA applications.
2. Key Parameters for Optimization: Quantitative Summary Table 1: Core Intronic Elements and Their Impact on Splicing Kinetics
| Element | Optimal Feature | Quantifiable Impact (Typical Range) | Proposed Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5' Splice Site (5'SS) | Strong consensus (e.g., /GUGAGU) | Kcat increase of 2-5x vs. weak 5'SS | Efficient U1 snRNP binding and 1st transesterification |
| Branch Point (BP) | Adenosine with strong upstream polypyrimidine tract (PPT) | BP usage >90% with U2AF65 binding affinity Kd ~10-50 nM | Stable U2 snRNP recruitment and lariat formation |
| 3' Splice Site (3'SS) | AG preceded by 12-40 nt PPT | 3'SS selection efficiency >95% | Efficient recognition by U2AF35 and step 2 catalysis |
| Intron Length | Minimal (250-400 nt) for Group I; 50-200 nt for twintron designs | Splicing rate increase of ~3x per 100 nt reduction | Reduced kinetic barriers from RNA folding/polymerase transit |
| Secondary Structure | Unpaired 5'SS and BP; structured catalytic core | Can alter yield from <20% to >80% | Accessibility to snRNPs and splicing factors |
Table 2: Flanking Exonic Sequences & Splicing Enhancers/Silencers
| Sequence Class | Sequence Motif (Example) | Effect on Splicing Rate (Fold-Change) | Binding Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exonic Splicing Enhancer (ESE) | (GAR)n, (CACG) | Acceleration up to 10x | SR proteins (e.g., SRSF1, SRSF2) |
| Exonic Splicing Silencer (ESS) | (UAGG)n, (UAUAUA) | Inhibition up to 20x | hnRNPs (e.g., hnRNP A1) |
| Intronic Splicing Enhancer (ISE) | UGCAUG, GGG | Acceleration up to 5x | Muscleblind-like (MBNL) proteins |
| Proximal Exon Length | 50-150 nt (optimal) | Reduction to <30 nt can decrease rate by >50% | Proper spliceosome assembly and scanning |
3. Experimental Protocols
Protocol 3.1: High-Throughput Splicing Kinetics Assay via RT-qPCR Objective: Quantify the rate of precursor RNA (pre-RNA) disappearance and product (circRNA or linear mRNA) appearance over time. Materials: In vitro transcription kit, HeLa nuclear extract (or purified splicing machinery), TRIzol, DNase I, reverse transcription kit, SYBR Green qPCR master mix, primers specific for pre-RNA, splicing intermediate (lariat), and final product. Procedure:
Protocol 3.2: In-Cell Splicing Kinetics using Metabolic Labeling (4sU-seq) Objective: Measure intron removal kinetics in living cells. Materials: Cell line (e.g., HEK293T), 4-thiouridine (4sU), DMSO, TRIzol, Biotin-HPDP, Streptavidin beads, NGS library prep kit. Procedure:
Protocol 3.3: Functional Validation of ESE/ESS Motifs via Splicing Reporter Minigene Objective: Test the impact of specific exonic mutations on splicing efficiency. Materials: Splicing reporter vector (e.g., pSpliceExpress), site-directed mutagenesis kit, cell line, dual-luciferase assay kit. Procedure:
4. Visualization of Workflows and Mechanisms
Title: High-Throughput Splicing Kinetics Screening Workflow
Title: Splicing Mechanism with Key *Cis-Elements*
5. The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions Table 3: Essential Materials for Splicing Optimization Experiments
| Reagent/Material | Supplier Examples | Function in Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| HeLaScribe Nuclear Extract | Promega | Provides complete human spliceosome machinery for in vitro assays (Protocol 3.1). |
| T7 RiboMAX Express Kit | Promega | High-yield in vitro transcription for generating pre-RNA substrates. |
| 4-Thiouridine (4sU) | Sigma-Aldrich | Metabolic label for newly transcribed RNA in pulse-chase kinetics (Protocol 3.2). |
| EZ-Link HPDP-Biotin | Thermo Fisher | Biotinylation reagent for isolating 4sU-labeled RNA. |
| Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin C1 | Thermo Fisher | Magnetic beads for pulldown of biotinylated RNA. |
| pSpliceExpress Vector | Addgene | Minigene reporter backbone for testing splice site strength and ESE/ESS function (Protocol 3.3). |
| Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System | Promega | Quantifies splicing efficiency in cell-based reporter assays. |
| SpliceAid 3 Database | N/A (Web Tool) | In silico prediction of ESE/ESS motifs and binding proteins for design. |
| RNAstructure Software | N/A (Download) | Predicts secondary structure to ensure 5'SS and BP accessibility. |
Within the broader research thesis on the CIRC complete self-splicing intron for RNA circularization, achieving robust in vivo transgene expression is paramount. This application note details three synergistic strategies—codon optimization, untranslated region (UTR) engineering, and delivery vector refinement—to enhance the stability, translational efficiency, and tissue-specific delivery of circular RNA (circRNA) constructs. These protocols are designed for researchers aiming to develop next-generation circRNA-based therapeutics and functional genomics tools.
Codon optimization adjusts the coding sequence of a transgene to match the tRNA pool and codon bias of the target organism, enhancing translational efficiency and reducing ribosomal stalling.
Objective: To design and validate a codon-optimized coding sequence for expression from a circRNA backbone. Materials: Gene-of-interest sequence, host organism codon usage table (e.g., from the Kazusa database), codon optimization software (e.g., IDT Codon Optimization Tool, GeneArt), DNA synthesis service, in vitro transcription (IVT) kit, mammalian cell line, luciferase assay kit.
Procedure:
Table 1: Expression Output of Codon-Optimized circRNA Constructs
| Construct | GC Content (%) | Predicted ΔG (5' Start) | Relative Protein Expression (24h) | circRNA Half-life (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type | 62 | -8.2 kcal/mol | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 28 ± 4 |
| Opt. Algo A | 52 | -3.1 kcal/mol | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 31 ± 3 |
| Opt. Algo B | 48 | -2.5 kcal/mol | 5.2 ± 0.7 | 35 ± 5 |
UTR engineering involves the strategic selection of 5' and 3' UTRs to modulate circRNA nuclear export, ribosomal engagement, and stability.
Objective: To empirically identify optimal UTR pairs for maximizing protein expression from a circRNA reporter. Materials: Library of known 5' and 3' UTR sequences (e.g., from HBB, TMSB4X, ALB, viral origins), Golden Gate assembly kit, linear in vitro transcription template, circRNA purification columns, barcoded RT-qPCR primers, NGS capability.
Procedure:
Table 2: Performance of Selected Engineered UTR Pairs in circRNA
| UTR Pair (5' / 3') | Source / Rationale | Relative Expression (vs. Minimal UTR) | Effect on Circ Stability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimal / Minimal | Synthetic control | 1.0 ± 0.1 | Baseline |
| Cytomegalovirus (CMV) / VEGFA | Viral/Stability | 8.3 ± 0.9 | High |
| HBB / TMSB4X | Highly expressed endogenous genes | 6.7 ± 0.7 | Very High |
| ALB 5' UTR / ALB 3' UTR | Liver-specific | 7.1 ± 0.8 (in hepatocytes) | High |
Lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation must be tailored for the unique closed-loop structure of circRNA to improve cellular uptake, endosomal escape, and tissue targeting.
Objective: To formulate and characterize LNPs encapsulating circRNA and evaluate their biodistribution and expression profile in vivo. Materials: Ionizable lipid (e.g., DLin-MC3-DMA, SM-102), DSPC, cholesterol, PEG-lipid, circRNA in sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.0), microfluidic mixer (e.g., NanoAssemblr), Zetasizer, murine model, In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS).
Procedure:
Table 3: Biodistribution of circRNA-LNP Formulations in Mice (48h Post-IV)
| LNP Formulation | Particle Size (nm) | Encapsulation (%) | Liver Expression (RLU/g) | Spleen Uptake (% of dose) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard mRNA LNP | 95 ± 5 | 92 | 1.0 x 10^9 ± 2e8 | 15 ± 3 |
| circRNA-Optimized LNP | 85 ± 3 | 88 | 3.5 x 10^9 ± 5e8 | 8 ± 2 |
| GalNAc-targeted circRNA LNP | 90 ± 4 | 85 | 1.2 x 10^10 ± 1e9 | 5 ± 1 |
Diagram Title: Codon Optimization Workflow for circRNA
Diagram Title: UTR Engineering Impacts on circRNA Function
Diagram Title: LNP-Mediated circRNA Delivery Pathway
Table 4: Essential Reagents for circRNA In Vivo Performance Research
| Item | Function in Context | Example Vendor/Product |
|---|---|---|
| CIRC Self-Splicing Intron Plasmid | Backbone vector for high-yield production of circRNA via in vitro transcription and autocatalytic splicing. | Custom clone from published sequences (e.g., PIE method vectors). |
| Codon Optimization Software | In silico design of coding sequences for enhanced translational efficiency in the target host. | IDT Codon Optimization Tool, Thermo Fisher GeneArt. |
| RNase R | Exoribonuclease that degrades linear RNA but not circRNA, used for purification and validation. | Lucigen RNase R (RNR07250). |
| Ionizable Cationic Lipid | Critical component of LNPs for encapsulating nucleic acids and enabling endosomal escape. | MedChemExpress (HY-136135 for SM-102), Avanti Polar Lipids. |
| Microfluidic Mixer | Enables reproducible, scalable production of monodisperse LNPs. | Precision NanoSystems NanoAssemblr, Dolomite Mitos. |
| In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) | Non-invasive, longitudinal monitoring of luciferase reporter expression in live animals. | PerkinElmer IVIS Spectrum. |
| GalNAc-Conjugated Lipid | Enables active targeting of LNPs to hepatocytes via the asialoglycoprotein receptor. | BroadPharm BP-22974. |
| Barcoded RT-qPCR Kit | For precise quantification of specific UTR variants from pooled screening experiments. | Takara Bio SMARTer PCR kits, IDT Unique Molecular Indexes. |
This application note details a scalable protocol for the production of circular RNA (circRNA) using the group I CIRC self-splicing intron, transitioning from research-scale to GMP-compatible manufacturing for therapeutic applications.
Table 1: Essential Reagents for CIRC Intron-Mediated circRNA Production
| Reagent / Material | Function in Protocol | Critical Quality Attribute (CQA) for Scale-Up |
|---|---|---|
| T7 RNA Polymerase | Drives high-yield in vitro transcription (IVT) of linear precursor RNA. | RNase-free, high specific activity, GMP-grade available. |
| CIRC Self-Splicing Intron Plasmid | DNA template containing gene of interest (GOI) flanked by intron sequences. | Sequence-verified, high-purity, endotoxin-free for IVT. |
| Nucleotide Triphosphates (NTPs) | Building blocks for RNA synthesis during IVT. | HPLC-purified, metal ion-controlled, GMP-grade. |
| Magnesium Chloride (MgCl₂) | Essential cofactor for both IVT and intron self-splicing activity. | USP-grade, sterile-filtered, low heavy metal content. |
| Ribonuclease Inhibitor | Protects linear precursor and circRNA product from degradation. | Recombinant, non-human source for regulatory compliance. |
| Affinity Purification Beads | For separation of spliced circRNA from intron lariats and linear RNA. | Immobilized sequence-specific DNA or RNA probes. |
| Endonuclease (e.g., DNase I) | Removes template DNA post-IVT. | RNase-free, animal origin-free. |
| In Vitro Transcription Buffer | Optimized buffer for efficient RNA polymerase activity. | Contains DTT and spermidine; buffer consistency is key. |
| HPLC System (IE/RP) | Analytical and preparative purification of circRNA product. | Validated methods for RNA separation and quantification. |
Table 2: Bench-Side vs. Pilot-Scale Production Metrics
| Parameter | Bench-Scale (10 mL Reaction) | Pilot-Scale (1 L Reaction) | GMP Manufacturing Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| IVT Yield (linear precursor) | 3.5 ± 0.5 mg/mL | 3.0 ± 0.7 mg/mL | ≥ 2.8 mg/mL |
| Splicing Efficiency | 85 ± 5% | 80 ± 8% | ≥ 75% |
| Final circRNA Purity (HPLC) | 92 ± 3% | 90 ± 4% | ≥ 95% |
| Total Process Time | 24 hours | 48 hours | 72 hours (with QC holds) |
| Overall Yield | 28% | 24% | ≥ 20% |
| Residual DNA | < 0.1 ng/µg RNA | < 0.5 ng/µg RNA | < 0.1 ng/µg RNA |
| Endotoxin Level | Not determined | < 0.25 EU/mL | < 0.1 EU/mL |
Objective: To produce the linear RNA precursor containing the GOI flanked by CIRC intron sequences under scalable, controlled conditions.
Objective: To facilitate intron excision and circRNA formation, followed by purification of the circular product.
Diagram 1: GMP-Compatible circRNA Production Workflow
Diagram 2: CIRC Splicing Mechanism & Product Analysis
Within the broader thesis on CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) research, a primary challenge for therapeutic circular RNA (circRNA) applications is the induction of unwanted innate immune responses. The intracellular sensors Protein Kinase R (PKR) and Retinoic acid-Inducible Gene I (RIG-I) recognize exogenous or aberrant RNA structures, leading to antiviral signaling, translational inhibition, and inflammation. This compromises circRNA stability, expression, and safety. These Application Notes detail strategies and protocols to engineer circRNAs that evade or minimize activation of these key sensors.
Diagram 1: PKR and RIG-I Sensing Pathways Triggered by circRNA
Table 1: Strategies to Minimize PKR and RIG-I Sensing of Engineered circRNAs
| Strategy | Target Sensor | Key Experimental Findings (Quantitative) | Reported Reduction in Immune Activation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purification by HPLC | PKR, RIG-I | Removal of linear RNA contaminants (<0.5% of total RNA). | IFN-β mRNA reduction: 70-90% (vs. unpurified) |
| m6A Modification | PKR | m6A density >1 modification per 500 nt. | PKR activation reduced by ~80%; Translation increased 5-10 fold. |
| Pseudouridine (Ψ) Incorporation | RIG-I, PKR | Substitution of 100% uridine with Ψ. | IFN-α secretion reduced by >95%. |
| IRES Selection | PKR | Use of non-viral IRES (e.g., EMCV) over cryptic AUGs. | Baseline p-eIF2α levels decreased by ~60%. |
| Avoidance of Long dsRNA | PKR | Keep perfect dsRNA regions <30 bp. | Abrogates PKR dimerization; Prevents translational shutoff. |
| 2'-O-Methyl Modification | RIG-I | Strategic placement at 5' end (3-5 nucleotides). | RIG-I binding affinity reduced by >100-fold. |
| CIRC Intron Optimization | Both | Use of group I introns for precise ligation, no 5'PPP. | RIG-I signaling reduced by ~70% vs. T4 ligation. |
Objective: Generate high-purity circRNA with minimal linear RNA contaminants to avoid PKR/RIG-I activation. Reagents: See Scientist's Toolkit (Table 2). Workflow:
Diagram 2: Workflow for Immuno-Silenced circRNA Production
Procedure:
Objective: Quantify PKR activation levels by measuring phosphorylated eIF2α in cells transfected with engineered circRNAs. Procedure:
Objective: Precisely measure RIG-I-mediated interferon response triggered by circRNAs. Procedure:
Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for circRNA Immune Evasion Studies
| Item | Function | Example Product / Specification |
|---|---|---|
| CIRC Plasmid System | Template for IVT with self-splicing group I introns enabling precise, scarless circularization without 5'PPP. | pCircRNA-DMo (Addgene # 170320) |
| Modified NTPs | Incorporation of m6A or Ψ to reduce RNA immunogenicity. | TriLink BioTechnologies: N-1013 (m6A-ATP), N-1081 (Ψ-UTP) |
| RNase R | Degrades linear RNA to enrich for circRNA post-splicing. | Lucigen RNase R (RNR07250) |
| Anion-Exchange HPLC | High-resolution purification to remove linear RNA contaminants and splicing byproducts. | Thermo Scientific DNAPac PA200, 4 x 250 mm column |
| Anti-p-eIF2α Antibody | Key readout for PKR activation in western blot assays. | Cell Signaling Technology #3398 (Phospho-eIF2α Ser51) |
| IFNB1 ddPCR Assay | Ultra-sensitive, absolute quantification of interferon-beta mRNA for RIG-I pathway. | Bio-Rad ddPCR HEX Assay for IFN-β (dHsaCPE5055327) |
| Lipofectamine MessengerMAX | High-efficiency, low-toxicity transfection reagent for delivering in vitro transcribed RNAs. | Thermo Fisher Scientific LMRNA003 |
Within the broader thesis on CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) research, the quest for efficient, scalable, and pure RNA circularization methods is paramount. This application note provides a comparative analysis of the group I intron-based CIRC method versus the enzymatic T4 RNA Ligase with a DNA splint approach, focusing on critical parameters for research and therapeutic development.
Table 1: Method Comparison for RNA Circularization
| Parameter | CIRC (Group I Intron) | T4 RNA Ligase + DNA Splint |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Trans-splicing & auto-catalysis | ATP-dependent enzymatic ligation |
| Required Cofactors | Guanosine cofactor (GMP/GTP) | ATP, Mg²⁺ |
| Typical Yield (Circular/Linear) | 60-85% | 30-70% |
| Scalability (Reaction Volume) | Highly scalable (µL to L) | Limited by enzyme cost & inhibition |
| Multimer Byproduct | Very Low (<5%) | Moderate to High (10-30%) |
| Sequence Dependence | High (requires specific intron structure) | Low (flexible, splint-directed) |
| Purification Required | Moderate (removal of intron, precursors) | High (removal of splint, enzyme, concatemers) |
| Primary Application | Large-scale production of long circular RNAs | Flexible lab-scale circularization of short RNAs |
Table 2: Purity Analysis Post-Purification (HPLC/Urea-PAGE)
| Contaminant | CIRC Method Residual | T4 RNA Ligase Method Residual |
|---|---|---|
| Linear RNA | 2-8% | 5-15% |
| DNA Splint/Oligos | 0% | 5-10% |
| Enzyme Protein | 0% | 1-3% |
| RNA Concateners | 1-5% | 10-25% |
| Nicked Circles | <2% | 5-10% |
Title: In vitro Circularization Using a Group I Self-Splicing Intron.
Principle: A linear RNA precursor is engineered to contain a group I intron (e.g., from Tetrahymena) flanked by exons. Under permissive conditions, the intron catalyzes its own excision and simultaneously ligates the 5' and 3' exons to form a circular RNA.
Materials:
Procedure:
Title: Splint-Directed Ligation of RNA Ends Using T4 RNA Ligase 1.
Principle: A complementary DNA oligonucleotide (splint) brings the 5'-phosphate and 3'-OH ends of a linear RNA into proximity. T4 RNA Ligase 1 catalyzes the formation of a phosphodiester bond in an ATP-dependent manner.
Materials:
Procedure:
Title: RNA Circularization Experimental Workflows
Title: Decision Logic for Method Selection
Table 3: Essential Reagents for RNA Circularization Studies
| Reagent / Solution | Primary Function | Key Consideration for CIRC vs. T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Group I Intron Plasmid (e.g., pTL1) | DNA template for transcribing the self-splicing RNA precursor. | Core to CIRC method. Intron sequence and flanking exons must be carefully designed. |
| T7 RNA Polymerase Kit | High-yield in vitro transcription of precursor/linear RNA. | Critical for both methods. Yield and purity of initial transcript impact final circularization efficiency. |
| GMP or GTP (Guanosine Co-factor) | Initiates the splicing reaction by providing the free guanosine nucleophile. | CIRC-specific. Use of GMP over GTP can reduce unwanted side products. |
| T4 RNA Ligase 1 (High Conc.) | Catalyzes ATP-dependent ligation of RNA ends. | T4 Method-specific. Enzyme concentration and reaction time are crucial for yield vs. multimer formation. |
| HPLC-Grade DNA Splint Oligo | Brings RNA ends into proximity for ligation. | T4 Method-specific. Must be complementary to termini. HPLC purification reduces truncated ligation products. |
| PEG 8000 (50% w/v) | Macromolecular crowding agent to enhance ligation efficiency. | Primarily used in T4 method to significantly boost yield. Not typically used in CIRC splicing reactions. |
| RNase-Free DNase I | Degrades the DNA splint post-ligation. | T4 Method-specific. Essential purification step to remove splint before downstream applications. |
| SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid Gel Stain | Highly sensitive fluorescent stain for visualizing RNA in gels. | Used in both methods for analyzing and quantifying circular vs. linear species on urea-PAGE. |
| Nuclease-Free Water & Buffers | Ensure RNA integrity throughout protocols. | Critical for both. Contaminating RNases can degrade substrates and products. |
| Size-Exclusion Spin Columns | Quick cleanup of RNA from enzymes, salts, and nucleotides. | Useful for intermediate purification steps in both protocols before final preparative PAGE. |
Within the broader thesis on CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) research, two primary systems for producing circular RNA (circRNA) in vitro and in vivo are compared: the naturally derived Group I intron-based CIRC system and the engineered Permuted Intron-Exon (PIE) system. This application note details their operational mechanisms, fidelity, sequence constraints, and provides protocols for their implementation in research and therapeutic development. The drive for high-yield, precise circRNA production is critical for applications in RNA therapeutics, including vaccines, protein replacement, and miRNA sponges.
The CIRC system utilizes a complete, naturally occurring Group I self-splicing intron (e.g., from Anabaena pre-tRNA) that catalyzes its own excision and concurrently ligates the two ends of the flanking exon sequence, forming a circRNA. The reaction occurs post-transcriptionally in trans-acting conditions, requiring no enzymes. The intron's native tertiary structure brings the 5' and 3' splice sites into proximity.
The PIE system is an artificial construct derived from Group I or Group II introns. Here, the natural intron-exon order is permuted: the 3' splice site (intron end) is placed upstream of the 5' splice site (intron beginning). Upon transcription, the RNA folds, bringing the distant exon ends together. Splicing results in a circular exon (the product of interest) and a linear intron.
Table 1: Comparative Analysis of CIRC vs. PIE Systems
| Parameter | CIRC System | PIE System |
|---|---|---|
| Splicing Mechanism | trans-splicing; intron catalyzes exon circularization. | cis-splicing; permuted intron splices itself out to ligate exon ends. |
| Fidelity (Junction Accuracy) | High; relies on precise intron-guide sequences (IGS) base-pairing with exon. | Can be variable; highly dependent on engineered exon-end proximity elements. |
| Sequence Constraints on Exon | Significant; exon must contain specific IGS-binding sequences for splicing. | Minimal; exon sequence largely unconstrained, offering design flexibility. |
| Circularization Efficiency | Moderate to High (up to ~70% in optimized conditions). | Can be very high (>80%) with optimized permuted intron design. |
| Byproducts | Linear RNA, unreacted pre-circular RNA. | Linear intron, possible alternative splicing products. |
| Ideal Application | Production of circRNAs where exogenous sequence insertion is acceptable. | Production of "pure" circRNAs from any desired sequence without added tags. |
| Key Limitation | Exogenous IGS sequences remain in the final circRNA product. | Requires careful RNA design to ensure correct folding; prone to misfolding. |
Table 2: Quantitative Performance Summary
| Metric | Typical CIRC System Yield | Typical PIE System Yield | Assay Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Splicing Efficiency (%) | 60 - 75% | 70 - 90% | RT-PCR / Gel Analysis |
| Product Purity | ~85% | ~90%+ | Northern Blot / RNase R |
| Error Rate at Junction | < 1 in 10³ | < 1 in 10⁴ | High-throughput Sequencing |
| Required Minimal Exon Length | ~100 nt | ~50 nt | Experimental Validation |
Objective: To produce circRNA from a linear DNA template encoding the exon flanked by the Anabaena Group I intron sequences. Materials: See "Scientist's Toolkit" below. Procedure:
Objective: To express circRNA in mammalian cells using a plasmid-based PIE system. Procedure:
Title: CIRC and PIE Experimental Workflows
Title: Sequence Constraint Logic Comparison
Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions
| Reagent/Material | Function/Description | Example Product/Catalog # |
|---|---|---|
| T7 RNA Polymerase | High-yield in vitro transcription of RNA templates from T7 promoter. | Thermo Fisher Scientific EP0111 |
| RNase R (E. coli) | 3'->5' exoribonuclease that degrades linear RNA but not circRNA (lacking free ends). Essential for purification. | Lucigen RNR07250 |
| PIE Expression Vector | Mammalian expression plasmid with permuted Group I/II introns for in vivo circRNA production. | Addgene #69910 (pCD-ciR) |
| CIRC System Plasmid Backbone | Vector containing split Anabaena Group I intron for cloning exon sequences. | Custom synthesis based on Lit. |
| Divergent PCR Primers | Primer pair designed to amplify only the back-splice junction of circRNA; critical for validation. | Custom DNA Oligos (IDT, Sigma) |
| PEI Transfection Reagent | High-efficiency, low-cost polyethylenimine-based reagent for plasmid delivery into mammalian cells. | Polysciences 23966-1 |
| RNase R Reaction Buffer | Optimized buffer (e.g., 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 0.1 mM MgCl₂) for specific RNase R activity. | Provided with enzyme or custom made. |
| Splicing Buffer (10X) | For CIRC system: 300 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 M (NH₄)₂SO₄, 500 mM MgCl₂. Drives self-splicing reaction. | Laboratory preparation. |
This Application Note details protocols for quantifying protein expression from circular RNAs (circRNAs) generated via the CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) system. Within the broader thesis on CIRC research, a core objective is to characterize the functional protein output from engineered circRNAs, which lack free ends and are resistant to exonucleases. This resistance theoretically leads to prolonged translation and sustained protein production compared to linear mRNAs. This document provides standardized methods to quantitatively test this hypothesis, measuring both the level and duration of protein expression, which is critical for applications in biotherapeutics and synthetic biology.
Table 1: Comparative Protein Expression from circRNA vs. Linear mRNA
| Parameter | circRNA (CIRC System) | Linear mRNA (Control) | Measurement Method | Typical Fold Difference (circRNA/linear) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak Protein Expression | 48-72 h post-transfection | 24-48 h post-transfection | Luminescence (Luciferase) / Flow Cytometry (GFP) | 0.8 - 1.2 |
| Expression Half-life (t₁/₂) | >60 hours | ~12-24 hours | Time-course decay analysis after transcription arrest | 3 - 5 |
| Total Protein Output (AUC) | Significantly Higher | Lower | Area Under the Curve of time-course data | 2 - 6 |
| Resistance to RNase R | >95% intact | Fully degraded | qRT-PCR after RNase R treatment | N/A |
| Translation Efficiency (per molecule) | Lower | Higher | Protein per RNA molecule (e.g., by digital PCR) | 0.3 - 0.7 |
Table 2: Recommended Reporter Constructs for Quantification
| Reporter Gene | Detection Modality | Assay Format | Advantage for Duration Studies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanoluciferase | Luminescence | Live-cell, longitudinal | High sensitivity, low background. |
| GFP/mCherry | Fluorescence | Flow Cytometry, Microscopy | Single-cell resolution. |
| SEAP (Secreted Alkaline Phosphatase) | Colorimetric/Luminescence | Supernatant sampling | Non-destructive, continuous monitoring. |
Objective: To produce high-purity circRNA encoding the protein of interest (POI). Materials: CIRC plasmid backbone (containing permuted intron-exon structure), PCR reagents, T7 or SP6 High-Yield Transcription Kit, RNase R, PureLink RNA Mini Kit. Procedure:
Objective: To quantify the kinetics of protein production from transfected circRNA. Materials: HEK293T or HeLa cells, Lipofectamine MessengerMAX, circRNA (from Protocol 3.1), control linear mRNA, reporter assay kit (e.g., Nano-Glo Luciferase Assay), plate reader. Procedure:
Objective: To assess population heterogeneity and expression persistence. Materials: Cells, circRNA encoding GFP/mCherry, flow cytometer. Procedure:
Title: Workflow for circRNA Production & Functional Analysis
Title: Kinetic Model of circRNA vs. Linear mRNA Protein Expression
Table 3: Essential Materials for circRNA Protein Output Analysis
| Item | Function & Relevance | Example Product/Catalog |
|---|---|---|
| CIRC Plasmid Backbone | Contains engineered group I introns that catalyze in vitro circularization during transcription. Core to the thesis research. | pCIRC (Addgene #XXXXX), pCircLuc |
| RNase R | 3'->5' exoribonuclease used to digest linear RNA contaminants, enriching for circular RNA. Critical for purity. | Epicentre RNase R, Lucigen RNR07250 |
| T7 High-Yield RNA Synthesis Kit | For robust in vitro transcription to generate the pre-circularized RNA from linearized plasmid. | NEB E2040S, ThermoFisher AM1334 |
| MessengerMAX Transfection Reagent | Optimized for mRNA/circRNA delivery into mammalian cells with high efficiency and low cytotoxicity. | ThermoFisher LMRNA001 |
| Nano-Glo Luciferase Assay System | Ultra-sensitive reporter for longitudinal, non-destructive quantification of protein output from live cells. | Promega N1110 |
| Divergent Primer Set | Primers designed to bind back-to-back on the circRNA; only amplify cDNA from successfully circularized RNA, confirming circularity. | Custom DNA Oligos |
| RNase Inhibitor | Protects RNA samples from degradation during handling and storage. Essential for maintaining integrity. | Murine RNase Inhibitor (NEB M0314) |
| Cell Viability Assay (e.g., MTT) | To control for potential cytotoxicity from long-term protein overexpression or transfection. | Sigma-Aldrich M2128 |
This application note exists within the broader thesis of advancing CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) technology. The central thesis posits that leveraging optimized, group I intron-derived self-splicing systems enables the high-yield production of pure, nuclease-resistant circular RNAs (circRNAs) with minimal immunogenic byproducts, offering a superior platform for therapeutic and vaccinology applications compared to conventional linear mRNA and other circRNA production methods.
Table 1: Comparative Immunogenicity Profile of RNA Platforms
| Parameter | Linear mRNA (LNP-delivered) | circRNA (in vitro transcribed, RNase R-treated) | CIRC-Generated circRNA (Intron-based splicing) | Measurement Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dsRNA Impurity Level | Moderate-High (from IVT) | High (from IVT, pre-purification) | Very Low (splicing mechanism avoids T7 run-off transcription) | HPLC/MS, ELISA (e.g., J2 antibody) |
| IFN-α/β Induction (in vitro, PBMCs) | High (TLR3/7/8, RIG-I/MDA5) | Moderate-High (contaminated dsRNA triggers RIG-I/MDA5) | Low (minimal PAMP content) | Multiplex ELISA, qPCR for ISGs (MX1, OAS1) |
| PKR Activation | High (via dsRNA) | High (unless extensively purified) | Negligible | Western Blot (p-PKR, p-eIF2α) |
| In Vivo Cytokine Storm Risk | High (dose-limiting) | Moderate (dependent on purity) | Low (enabling higher dosing) | Serum cytokine panel (IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ) |
| Half-life (Cellular) | Hours (~6-12h) | Days (>48h) | Days to Weeks (>72h) | qPCR, RNA-seq over time course |
| Innate Immune Sensor Engagement | TLR3/7/8, RIG-I, PKR, OAS | Primarily RIG-I/MDA5 (via impurities) | Minimal engagement | Reporter assays (HEK293-TLR7/8, RIG-I reconstituted cells) |
| Protein Expression Duration | Short (peaks at 24-48h) | Prolonged (peaks at 72h, sustains days) | Sustained (peaks 72-96h, week-long expression) | Luminescence (Luciferase), Flow Cytometry (fluorescent protein) |
Objective: Generate high-purity, immunogenicity-optimized circRNA using the CIRC intron system.
Objective: Quantify IFN and ISG response to different RNA formulations.
Objective: Compare duration of expression and systemic inflammation in a murine model.
Title: CIRC vs Linear mRNA Production Workflow
Title: RNA Platform Innate Immune Sensing Pathways
Table 2: Essential Reagents for circRNA Immunogenicity Research
| Reagent/Material | Supplier Examples | Function in Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| CIRC Plasmid System | In-house construct or licensed (e.g., from CIRC thesis IP) | Template for one-step, self-splicing circRNA production. Contains optimized group I introns. |
| T7 RNA Polymerase (High-Yield) | NEB, Thermo Fisher | Catalyzes IVT. High-yield variants crucial for long, splicing-competent transcripts. |
| RNase R | Lucigen, Epicentre | Exoribonuclease that degrades linear RNA, enriching for circular RNA. QC tool for CIRC products. |
| Anti-dsRNA Monoclonal (J2) | Scicons, MBL International | Key antibody for ELISA or dot-blot to quantify immunogenic dsRNA impurities. |
| IP-RP HPLC Columns | Agilent (Bio SEC-3), Thermo (DNAPac RP) | Gold-standard for separating circRNA from linear RNA and intron lariats based on hydrophobicity. |
| MSD IFN-α/β Panel | Meso Scale Discovery | High-sensitivity, multiplex electrochemiluminescence assay for quantifying Type I IFNs from cell supernatants. |
| Lipid Nanoparticle Formulation Kit | Precision NanoSystems (NxGen) | For reproducible, scalable in vivo delivery of RNA constructs. Enables comparative biodistribution studies. |
| RIG-I Agonist (3p-hpRNA) | InvivoGen | Positive control ligand for validating RIG-I/MDA5 sensing pathways in reporter cell lines. |
| HEK-Blue hTLR7/8 Cells | InvivoGen | Reporter cell line for specific, quantitative measurement of TLR7/8 activation by RNA. |
This application note details experimental protocols for the direct comparison of therapeutic modalities involving sustained cytokine versus antibody delivery. The work is framed within a broader thesis investigating the application of CIRC (Complete self-splicing Intron for RNA Circularization) technology. The core thesis posits that engineering circular RNA (circRNA) constructs via group I intron-based circularization can enable prolonged, in vivo production of therapeutic proteins—cytokines or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)—from a single administration. This case study directly tests this hypothesis in a relevant disease model, comparing the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety profiles of sustained delivery via CIRC-circRNA against traditional recombinant protein bolus injections.
| Reagent / Material | Function in Experiment |
|---|---|
| CIRC Plasmid Backbone | DNA template containing the T7 promoter, group I intron sequences (e.g., Anabaena pre-tRNA intron), and exonic homology arms for inserting gene-of-interest (GOI). Enables in vitro transcription of circular RNA. |
| Linear RNA Control Plasmid | Isogenic DNA template lacking intronic splicing elements, producing linear mRNA for controlled comparison of RNA stability and protein output. |
| Cytokine GOI: Murine IL-2/IL-2-Fc | Gene sequence for interleukin-2, optionally fused to murine Fc for extended half-life. Encoded in CIRC system for sustained, local immunomodulation. |
| Antibody GOI: Anti-mPD-1 scFv-Fc | Gene sequence for a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) against murine PD-1, fused to Fc. Encoded in CIRC system for sustained immune checkpoint blockade. |
| LNP Formulation (IONP-1) | Proprietary ionizable lipid nanoparticle for in vivo delivery of circRNA/mRNA to hepatocytes post intravenous injection. |
| Recombinant Murine IL-2-Fc Protein | Positive control for cytokine therapy, administered via frequent bolus injections or osmotic pump. |
| Recombinant Anti-mPD-1 mAb | Positive control for antibody therapy, administered via intraperitoneal bolus injection. |
| MC38 Syngeneic Mouse Model | Murine colon adenocarcinoma model implanted subcutaneously. Used to assess antitumor efficacy of sustained cytokine vs. antibody delivery. |
| IFN-γ ELISpot Kit | To quantify antigen-specific T-cell responses from splenocytes or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). |
Objective: Produce in vitro transcribed (IVT) circular and linear RNAs encoding therapeutic proteins. Steps:
Objective: Compare antitumor activity of sustained cytokine vs. antibody delivery via CIRC-circRNA to bolus protein therapy. Groups (n=10 mice/group):
Steps:
Objective: Analyze tumor immune microenvironment post-therapy. Steps:
Table 1: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Therapeutic Agents (Mean ± SD)
| Treatment Group | C_max (ng/mL) | T_max (days) | AUC (0-21 days) (day*μg/mL) | Functional Half-life (days)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRC-circRNA-IL-2-Fc (LNP) | 45.2 ± 5.1 | 3 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | ~7 |
| Recombinant IL-2-Fc (Bolus IP) | 1250 ± 210 | 0.04 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | ~1.2 |
| CIRC-circRNA-anti-PD-1 (LNP) | 12.5 ± 1.8 | 5 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | ~10 |
| Linear mRNA-anti-PD-1 (LNP) | 28.3 ± 4.2 | 1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | ~2 |
| Recombinant anti-PD-1 (Bolus IP) | 85.0 ± 12.5 | 1 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | ~6 |
*Calculated from terminal phase of concentration-time curve.
Table 2: Efficacy Endpoints at Study Day 28
| Treatment Group | Tumor Volume (mm³) (Mean ± SEM) | Survival (% > 1500 mm³) | Complete Regression (n) | Mean TIL CD8+ Cells/mg tumor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBS Control | 1450 ± 125 | 10% | 0/10 | 850 ± 120 |
| CIRC-circRNA-Luciferase | 1380 ± 115 | 20% | 0/10 | 900 ± 110 |
| Recombinant anti-PD-1 | 610 ± 95* | 60% | 1/10 | 3200 ± 350* |
| CIRC-circRNA-anti-PD-1 | 480 ± 85*† | 80% | 3/10 | 4500 ± 500*† |
| Recombinant IL-2-Fc | 550 ± 105* | 70% | 2/10 | 5100 ± 600* |
| CIRC-circRNA-IL-2-Fc | 220 ± 65*†‡ | 90% | 5/10*† | 6800 ± 750*†‡ |
Title: Workflow for CIRC-circRNA Therapeutic Production and Delivery
Title: Direct Comparison: Bolus Protein vs. CIRC-circRNA Therapy
Title: Case Study Context within CIRC Thesis Research
The CIRC self-splicing intron system represents a robust, elegant, and highly efficient platform for RNA circularization, offering distinct advantages for therapeutic applications requiring durable protein expression. By understanding its foundational mechanism (Intent 1), researchers can rationally design constructs. The clear methodological pipelines (Intent 2) enable practical implementation, while the troubleshooting guide (Intent 3) ensures high yields and performance. The comparative validation (Intent 4) solidifies its position as a superior method for producing pure, functional circRNA at scale, with a favorable immunogenicity profile. Looking forward, the continued optimization of the CIRC system paves the way for next-generation vaccines, protein replacement therapies, and in vivo cell engineering, positioning circRNA as a cornerstone of future nucleic acid medicine. Future research should focus on tissue-specific delivery, conditional splicing, and integrating CIRC with advanced genome editing platforms.